As I expressed in my remarks, we think we have achieved that balance, but we are always open to criticism and we are certainly open to constructive criticism. If they are ways we can improve the bill that do not do violence to the intentions of the bill, we would be all ears.
Comme je l'ai dit dans mon intervention, nous croyons avoir trouvé cet équilibre, mais nous sommes toujours ouverts à la critique, et surtout à la critique constructive.