It should be obvious that rejection was the only way in which the LDCs could demonstrate their freedom. It should be obvious too that the overly complex so-called global negotiation we advocate prior to each new cycle allows certain nations very little room for manoeuvre. These nations are forced to choose between endorsing agreements between Europe and the United States or bearing the blame for failure.
Comment ne pas comprendre que l’indigeste " négociation globale", qui nous sert de postulat avant chaque nouveau cycle, n’offre que peu de marge de manœuvre à des nations sommées d’avaliser les accords Europe/États-Unis ou d’endosser la responsabilité d’un échec?