So if you're going to exclude the aboriginal people of New Brunswick from entering the tuna fishery off Sambro, and if you're using the adjacency principle, as my colleague from Nunavut had said—and in our east coast report we had strongly recommended the adjacency principle—then wouldn't that adjacency principle apply to all fishermen of all aspects and all fisheries?
Donc, si on interdit aux Autochtones du Nouveau-Brunswick de pêcher le thon au large de Sambro, et si on utilise le principe relatif aux zones adjacentes, comme l`a dit ma collègue du Nunavut—et, dans notre rapport sur la côte est, nous l`avions fortement recommandé—, est-ce qu`il ne s`appliquerait pas à tous les pêcheurs, quels qu`ils soient, et à toutes les pêches?