Je le sais, mais le problème est qu'il y a toujours un occupant et un occupé et le premier veut continuer à imposer les règles du jeu alors que le second - l'occupé -, demande purement et simplement la fin de l'occupation et, par conséquent, la paix.
I am aware of this, but the question remains that there continues to be a situation where there is an occupier and the occupied, and the occupier wants to continue playing the game by its own rules, whilst the second – the occupied – is asking for a straightforward end to the occupation, and, with this, peace.